A New Place to Send Your Wild Ideas - ScienceInsider

Bains says he found a welcome home at the University of Buckingham, the United Kingdom's only private university, where Charlton is a visiting professor. The university's controversial Vice-Chancellor Terence Kealey—a passionate libertarian who, according to the Guardian, "may just be the most reactionary man in Britain"—strongly supports the new journal, Bains says. "They're not likely to cave in in the face of criticism if a paper produces controversy, like Elsevier did," adds Charlton. The University of Buckingham Press publishes five other journals.

Charlton, a reader in evolutionary psychiatry at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, sits on the editorial board of the new journal, as do two other scientists who quit Medical Hypotheses's Editorial Advisory Board recently. Charlton was fired because he refused to introduce a system of peer review to Medical Hypotheses. HyLS will have its papers reviewed by an editorial panel, not unlike the system Medical Hypotheses's new editor has now adopted. "It has a similar flavor to it," says Bains. The new journal will be online only and 'open access,' with authors paying a per-page fee and papers available for free.

Bains says he won't shun articles about politically incorrect topics such as race, as long as they are "well-argued, supported by good citations to data, and with a testable hypothesis." But he won't publish the retracted paper that cost Charlton his position at Medical Hypotheses. "I didn't think it was a very good paper," Bains says. "It wasn't very well-argued."

I'm not sure about this. I suppose having a place to publish less-developed ideas could be a good thing.

Podcast: Can Geoengineering Save the Planet? - ScienceNOW

SAN DIEGO%u2014Geoengineering has been a hot topic at this year%u2019s annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (which publishes ScienceNOW). Science reporter Eli Kintisch chatted with Ken Caldeira, a geochemist at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Stanford, California, about the latest efforts to cool the world%u2014and the possible risks of doing so. Listen to their conversation here and read Eli%u2019s full write-up on the topic here.

So, here's some real information on geoengineering. The chemtrail folks would do well to listen!

Protesting for the sake of it

Just outside the San Diego Convention Center, which was the base of the 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science conference (#AAAS2010), I passed a small group of protesters with various placards and in general looking a little disorganized, but as I like to keep an open mind I though I should stop and chat.
It turns out that it's an anti-geoengineering rally (though there are more letters in the word "geoengineering" than protesters). The focus was on contrails, which according to the lady I spoke with are a part of a vast governmental/corporate program to affect the climate, so we don't have to bother with lowering emissions - but the biological side-effects are terrible! I later discovered that wikipedia outlines this "chemtrails" conspiracy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory

Img_0595

Curious, and not being one to dismiss seemingly crazy suggestions out of hand, I tried to engage further, but it really just descended into a rant at this point. In the box of protest materials were "information" sheets concerning things people like to protest about - vaccinations, contrails, nuclear power, cars, etc. Clearly, rent-a-protest. She wouldn't or couldn't answer any of my (very polite and charming, and not condescending) questions about the science behind their claims. ScienceNow also picked up on this mini-protest: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/02/smattering-of-activists-protest...

Why do people do this? If they want to say "be careful with geoengineering", then say that. State why, and people will be polite enough to listen. If you're ranting then you're going to be ignored. We know science isn't perfect, but at least scientists attempt to communicate with the general public. Protesters really have a duty to become informed and stop spreading disinformation and downright lies. We have enough things back in the real world to worry about.